Democratic operatives accused of ballot tampering told to take deal or face trial

An absentee ballot scandal in Bridgeport, Connecticut, already forced the state’s largest city to throw out a Democratic mayoral primary and hold it again.

[snip]

The case carries significance beyond one heavily blue city. For years, Democrats and election officials have bristled at Republican warnings about absentee voting and ballot drop boxes. Bridgeport, however, offers a documented example that is difficult to explain away. The evidence came from city-owned cameras and even persuaded a judge that the rightful winner could not be determined without a redo.

[snip]

Four days later, Gomes’s campaign posted excerpts on Facebook from security cameras outside the city government complex, according to CT Mirror. The footage allegedly showed Geter-Pataky making repeated early-morning visits to a drop box and depositing stacks of absentee ballots.Bridgeport police video showing city employee Wanda Geter-Pataky placing absentee ballots into an election drop box outside the Margaret Morton Government Center, where she worked, is shown during Bridgeport Democratic Primary Mayoral candidate John Gomes’ challenge of absentee ballots in Superior Court in Bridgeport, Conn., Friday, Oct. 13, 2023. (Brian A. Pounds/Hearst Connecticut Media via AP, Pool)

” data-large-file=”https://www.conservativenewsdaily.net/breaking-news/wp-content/uploads//2026/07/localimages/AP23286787720005.jpg?w=696″ “https:>Bridgeport police video showing city employee Wanda Geter-Pataky placing absentee ballots into an election drop box outside the Margaret Morton Government Center, where she worked, is shown during Bridgeport Democratic Primary Mayoral candidate John Gomes’ challenge of absentee ballots in Superior Court in Bridgeport, Conn., Friday, Oct. 13, 2023. (Brian A. Pounds/Hearst Connecticut Media via AP, Pool)

More video recordings surfaced during Gomes’s lawsuit. A state judge overturned the primary, called the evidence “shocking,” and ordered another vote because he could not determine the legitimate result.

[snip]

Those results may have vindicated Ganim’s claim that voters wanted him to remain mayor. But they did not erase the conduct that caused the original primary results to become voided, nor the criminal cases that followed.

The shocking evidence of ballot stuffing in Bridgeport has only served to fuel the national election integrity debate, especially at a time when New Jersey officials recently discovered 6,600 individuals who were illegally registered to vote in the state, 400 of whom cast ballots in recent years. During a February interview, President Donald Trump called Connecticut “a very corrupt voting place,” in an unrelated jab at Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT).

PRESIDENT TRUMP talks support for the SAVE Act with @larry_kudlow as he calls out Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal:

“Connecticut is a very corrupt voting place. That’s why a guy like Blumenthal can keep getting elected.”

“He admitted that he cheated on the war like nobody’s… pic.twitter.com/cupTrG7l8q

— Fox News (@FoxNews) February 10, 2026

Trump more recently renewed his warnings about election vulnerabilities during a prime-time address earlier this month, which detailed alleged fraud “by a large-scale voter registration operation” in Michigan, among other key findings related to irregularities from the 2020 election.

[snip]

Yet in the same press release, Connecticut officials also highlighted cameras installed at ballot drop boxes and tighter absentee-ballot rules, though they conveniently left out any specific examples about what led them to tighten those security measures.

Local investigators ultimately charged nine people over the 2023 primary scandal. Geter-Pataky and Castillo were also charged over alleged misconduct in the 2019 Democratic primary, which Ganim won by 270 votes. Both pleaded not guilty to the 2019 charges and continue to contest their more recent charges.

[snip]

Prosecutors have not revealed whether Geter-Pataky or Castillo would face incarceration under their offers. Refusing the deals would place Bridgeport’s Democratic political machine and its absentee-ballot operation before a criminal court, with a trial possible as early as this fall.