If the walls aren’t closing in, the questions are certainly mounting about the Ilhan Omar case.

In the wake of the recent federal raid on the progressive congresswoman’s Washington, D.C., home, there’s been more reporting on her dubious marriage to a man who might be her brother and the murky circumstances of her arrival here in the United States.

We have been critics of the Trump administration’s targeting of its political enemies, and there’s no doubt that if Omar had an “R” following her name, the feds wouldn’t be doggedly pursuing her. But there’s much we still don’t know about the investigation, while what’s in the public record casts significant doubt on her immigration status. The New York Times reported the other day that federal agents during the Obama administration found evidence that she had married her brother.

[snip]

Omar has shed no light on any of this, saying only that she had an impulsive elopement with Elmi. She had already had children with Hirsi by this time, and curiously, legal filings suggest that Omar, Elmi, and Hirsi all used the same address. She also filed joint taxes with Hirsi while married to Elmi. Regarding the rumors in the Somali community about Elmi’s lifestyle, his social media profile is consistent with them, and his subsequent academic career has been focused on LGBTQ rights in African countries.

Another oddity is that the Omar-Elmi marriage certificate was signed by a Christian minister, a grave offense against sharia law (the suggestion is that any local imam may have known the real score and not wanted to have anything to do with it).

[snip]

Even if Omar did indeed marry her brother, the statute of limitations long expired on any fraud related to the sham; one reason federal investigators stood down in the Obama years is that this presented an insuperable obstacle to a prosecution.

The real significance of the alleged marriage to the brother would be the implication that Omar’s true name is Elmi; a recent DOJ filing referred to her as “Congresswoman Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, a/k/a Ilhan Abdullahi Omar.”

[snip]

There is much still to learn, and we are skeptical that there are going to be readily prosecutable offenses here that aren’t time-barred. As for a denaturalization proceeding, it would presumably be contentious and drawn out. But everyone should want to know the truth of this matter. It may be that Ilhan Omar doesn’t belong here, not just as a matter of her sheer ingratitude to the country that welcomed her from a Kenyan refugee camp but on the facts and legal merits as well.

(*) Full article: https://www.nationalreview.com/2026/11/the-murky-ilhan-omar-affair/